Who won?
Who won the war in Gaza? The conventional wisdom would
say that no-one won, because both sides took casualties that to each were
excessive. But, a more sober analysis would indicate that Israel won,
notwithstanding the spurious victory celebration in Gaza. Here are the reasons,
1. Hamas was forced to accept a ceasefire without
conditions after 50 days. Hamas vowed that they would not accept any
ceasefire without their conditions being met, namely a lifting of the Israeli
blockade, opening of all borders to free movement, a new sea port and a new
airport and release of rearrested prisoners. Although some of these conditions
might be subject to negotiation, Hamas has so far achieved none of them.
2. The Iron Dome anti-missile system worked amazingly
well and intercepted 90% of the missiles targeted on populated areas. Only
4 people were killed by ca. 4,500 missiles and mortars that Hamas and its
affiliates (Islamic Jihad, Popular Committees, Fatah) fired at Israel. This is
an abject failure, instead of causing mass casualties, they only scored one
death per thousand missiles, not an effective weapon.
3. Israel detected and destroyed 32 attack
tunnels, that opened into Israeli territory. This prevented a mass attack
of terrorists that was planned for later in the year, and destroyed the work of
millions of dollars and the strategy of Hamas to inflict mass casualties on
Israel.
4. Hamas received heavy losses, including ca.
1,000 fighters (usually counted a civilians by the media) killed in the fighting
and bombing, as well as numerous leaders of the organization who will be very
hard to replace. Also, many if not most of their construction facilities for
missiles and their control centers, some located in basements and others in high
towers, that they did not expect the IDF to destroy (partly because of the
civilians living there and partly because of the difficulty).
However, notwithstanding the losses of Hamas, the victory
of Israel was not clear-cut, for the following reasons; 1
1. The stated aim of Operation Defensive Edge was to
bring lasting peace and quiet to southern Israel, but there is no guarantee
that this has been achieved. Up to the last minute Hamas was still firing
missiles into southern Israel at roughly the same rate that it was at the
beginning of the campaign.
2. Hamas has not been
demilitarized. This can only be achieved if, after the negotiations to
follow a month of quiet, the international community agrees with Israel that
Hamas must be prevented from replacing the missiles and arms it lost. In other
word that Hamas must be disarmed. This will require that Israeli maintain the
blockade of Gaza, or that it be partially lifted, but with sufficient
international guarantees for Israel.
3. Hamas is still functional. Contrary to many
commentators it was not one of Israel's war aims to totally destroy Hamas,
rather to defeat its objectives. But, the question is, will Hamas still be
strong enough to not only remain in control of Gaza, but to continue in the
future to threaten Israel.
4. The IDF lost 64 soldiers. This is not a huge
number, but is very demoralizing for the small country of Israel, where everyone
knows someone who lost a son.
5. PM Netanyahu was too cautious. This is the
view of many on the right in Israel. They felt that once the IDF went into Gaza
on the ground, the focus on destroying the tunnels and then withdrawing was a
mistake. They should have gone all the way. In this view, Netanyahu failed to
use the full might of the IDF to Israel's advantage, even though it would have
resulted in more Israeli casualties.
Although we cannot come up with a final tally of relative
achievements at this juncture, with the current ceasefire we see that the IDF is
still poised to invade Gaza and that could lead to the destruction of Hamas.
This must be a deterrence for Hamas, but on the other hand, PM Netanyahu is
cautious, for two reasons, first he does not want to be blamed for further
losses to the IDF and second he does not want to be blamed by sections of his
coalition as well as the international community for expanding the war. Yet if,
after 30 days of the ceasefire, the indirect negotiations do not achieve an
agreement, then there is little doubt that the war will go on.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home